Skinny Books

Image

I had reached a certain time in my life. My hair fell out in soft, dark clouds. My teeth were sensitive, my heartbeat uneven, always cold, forgetting things easily. I watched my body wither in an almost voyeuristic way.

I was not then, nor am I now, and old woman. I was 15, 16, 17, and was living with an eating disorder. To say it sucked would be a pretty big understatement. When you, or someone you love develops an eating disorder, it’s easy to  want to point your finger at something or someone. It was the fault of the media! The perfect older sister! Genetics! Barbie! That time at Sea World when a random kid called her Shamu! Too often, I think, people view anoretics and bulimics as people who want to look like they’ve just walked off the cover of People Magazine. We accuse them of wanting to be sexy. Both men and women will tell anoretic women that ‘men don’t like bags of bones, so eat!’ as if their potentially fatal mental disorder was just a misguided attempt and making a man’s dick hard.

Very rarely do we ever look at the possibility of the young woman trying to achieve a different sort of aesthetic, an external and internal one, trying to become the sort of person she wants to be. The kind of person you read about in books.

I was, and still am, a voracious reader. At school, having had 1 low carb tortilla with 1/2 tsp sugar free raspberry jelly for breakfast, I would skip lunch and hide in the library to read. Whether or not I wanted to be, I was almost always transported into a world where the heroine was brave and smart and adventurous and maybe magical and…thin. Without fail, my starvation addled mind would attempt to seek out solace in books and be reminded that the kind of woman I wanted to be was also thin.

Tithe

Valiant

In the Belly of the Blood Hound

The Changeling 

Coraline 

A Series of Unfortunate Events

The SpiderWick Chronicles 

What Happened to Lani Garver

Soul Music

I could go on and on. These are books written by men and women alike. It seems like ‘thin’ has become the default appearance for a female character in fiction. Why? I can think of two reasons.

The first is that many of these characters are vivacious, or brooding, or just interesting in general. Society has created the aesthetic of this sort of woman; thin, interesting clothes, sips black coffee, is intensely artistic. This was the sort of woman I wanted to be, and when I thought about my future self in this light, being anything but thin just did not compute. This can also be done to make the protagonist look weaker, and more vulnerable, which aside from the general feeling of ‘fuck that’ I must point out that it’s a half-assed, cheating way to add that sort of depth to a character.

The second is that in a fantasy world, we want it to, well, be fantastic. Hollywood casting directors hire attractive actors and actresses for the same reason. In our fantasy land, we want to see beautiful people, and these days that usually means thin.

Of course, there were books that centered around above average girls. I read them too. I was able to garner a fun story as well as diet tips, because inevitably, they centered around losing weight, at least for the majority of the book. And when I finally managed to kick my eating disorder, I often had to stop reading books in the first few chapters; when the female protagonist was described as thin. I could not handle the fact that I was gaining the weight I needed to survive and hating every second of it, and that I was supposed to identify with this effortlessly svelte beauty.

What’s the point of this post? It’s that I’m fucking done. Done. D.O.N.E. I am done writing about conventional beauties. Never again will I write about a waif. If you feel that that’s exclusionary, I highly suggest you fuck off to the nearest library and surround yourself with the skinny heroines of damn near every book I’ve read. In my writing, I solemnly pledge to write about the kind of women and girls I see walking around on the street. I pledge to write about young girls that don’t have the makeup thing quite figured out yet. I pledge to write about chubby women who are not centering their lives around a diet.

High five if you want to join me.

 

When You Rule the Wrold

Image

One of the hallmarks of a mediocre artist is hiding behind the phrase ‘that’s just my style of drawing’ when something is critiqued. 9 times out of 10, the critique will be about physical proportions of people. Sure, cartoons are…well…cartoony, but all of the pros manage to incorporate a believable structure into the people they draw, so that it doesn’t look unbalanced and strange. The same can be applied to world building in your writing. You can’t hide behind ‘that’s just how that world works’ and expect the reader to be thrown off by clumsy writing. Here are some tips for making your world a little more believable:

Offer Explanations

Your main character finds a portal to another dimension, and discovers that in this dimension, her skin turns purple at night. No explanation for this is about as satisfying as “the stork” is for pubescent middle schoolers. Don’t be afraid to delve into your own world a bit. Make things up that sound believable, even if they are blatantly pseudoscientific. Does the light from the moon in that world interact with the melatonin in the main characters skin? Maybe it has something to do with what she eats in that world.

Stick to Your Laws

Other worlds in fiction often break the laws of physics in wonderful ways. However, having some steadfast fictional laws of physics can make your world seem much more real. Sure, people can fly, but they can only do so when the oxygen content of their blood is full, thus it would be very hard for them to sustain flying at great altitude. Or your world may allow a person to breathe under water, but only if they purchase a set of magical adhesive gills from one of the many shops lining the boardwalk. And once these laws are set, don’t violate them, unless the violation of these laws is considered abnormal in your world.

If It’s Zany, Give it a Purpose or Story

Your imagination is absolutely limitless, and one of the greatest joys of writing is the fact that we get to share it with other people. However, a limitless imagination doesn’t always translate well. Does your world have a random Orca that flies around wearing a pink tutu in an otherwise fairly normal environment? Something like that might throw a reader off, but you can help this by giving it a back story. Perhaps it’s one of the creations of a long dead wizard, who grew a little eccentric in his later years. Do you have a fountain that literally sings songs? There’s a lot of opportunity for foreshadowing there; utilize it.

These are just a few things that can make your world really come to life, and hopefully they’ll help you if you’re looking for advice. Happy writing

The Lights Have Dimmed: A Personal Update

Sending out queries can feel like being a new aspiring actress, hitting the Hollywood casting calls for the first time. You can rejections, sure, but you also get a few call backs and you feel like your dream could take off at any moment. Then slowly, the call back stop coming. You’ve already been rejected by most castings. The once exciting world around you begins to lose it’s color. It’s been a while since I’ve even gotten a rejection on my query. I’m not going to lie, it sucks, but I’m not about to shelve my story. I will, however, let it rest for a few weeks before I go through for another round of editing (same goes for the query and synopsis). 

When I take it out again, all actually print the monstrosity out and hopefully having a hard copy will help the editing process. I’m one of those people who likes to write things out by hand and draw diagrams to help myself think clearly. Stay tuned for sending out queries again probably in late June or July. 

Obviously I’ll still be posting in this blog, but I thought I’d include a personal update. 

The Plot Thickens

I’ve seen someone make ‘sushi’ with watermelon marinaded in soy sauce on Food Network. Tradition dictates that sushi, or at least most types, be made with fish. Those are the rules right? Not for that chef! Young artists everywhere are throwing the old structures and rules out the window! Who needs quotation marks? Marya Hornbacher sure doesn’t. Paint on a canvas? So last century. Leather jackets need structure? Not anymore! 

It’s liberating! It’s freeing! No rules!

Well, sorta. 

Years later we may look back at some of these new fangled ideas and wonder what the hell we were thinking. We might also acknowledge that the artist who really pulled off these new and innovative structures in their art was because the artists themselves were innovative and talented. Long story short; you can’t forget the basic principles of your art and expect good results unless you REALLY know what you’re doing. Sometimes it’s good to have a refresher in the basics, and since it was pointed out to me by the wonderful judges of the Writer’s Forum contest that I could use one, I started studying plot structure. 

Plot structure is relatively simple. You have the exposition, which contains basic information about the main character, as well as the back drop the story is set against. It could be as short as a few sentences, or as long as an entire chapter. What really starts the story, though, is the inciting incident. This is the BANG that sets everything in motion. If we’ve established that Johnny Walsh is an FBI agent, this is when he learns his adopted brother is a Russian Spy. This leads to the rising action. This is when the story intensifies, and if all goes well, keeps the readers eyes glued to the pages. When the rising action can go on no longer, the story reaches its climax. This is the highest point in the action. This is when Johnny aims the gun at his brother’s head, only to realize that he himself has already been shot in the chest. This is the tootsie center of the tootsie pop. After the climax, you have the falling action, where you’re gently lead down from the adrenaline high. Sometimes minor loose threads are tied up, or sometimes a subplot is wrapped up. After all the action of your story is done, you hit the denouement. This is your happy (or not so happy) ending.

So why study it further? Because sometimes, you have to, and there are a surprising amount of pitfalls that can result by not doing so.

I’ve added my own pictures, because I can and because I couldn’t find ‘wrong’ examples on the interwebs (not that I looked very hard). First up, is the plot structure you were taught in grade school:

Image

 It’s simple symmetrical, and easy to draw. While it gets all the points across, and is a good foundation, you’ll find that most stories don’t follow it exactly. Readers tend to get bored if the falling action is as lengthy as the rising action. Yes, Johnny is in the hospital and will be ok. We get it. We don’t need 5 chapters on how he dutifully takes his meds and his primary nurse has a lisp. 

Nonetheless, most of us grew up with this diagram, and most of us grew bored with it. So we started experimenting. Here are two fairly common plot pitfalls I’ve come across. I call this one, the SUDDEN MOUNTAIN.

Image

BAM! Right in there with that instant action hook. The story is going along great, just sprinkle in some background details where needed. Keep going until POW! What a great climax! Well, the good part is over, so pretty much there you have it, right? The end? 

I’m guilty of doing this. These days writers are so paranoid about grabbing a reader that many of us put way too much focus into that. The opposite, I think, is the MOOD HILL. 

Image

These are the sorts of stories I read that sometimes center around a cool bunch of people, the story taking place entirely in their conversations. There’s a lot of exposition and attention to detail. Every detail, to be exact. You will have the scenery in this story burned into your minds eye for all eternity. I believe writers are trying to go with a subtle, artist sort of theme, but sometimes it can come across as rather flat. 

So how the hell does one get it right? Here’s a modern plot line:

Image

The exposition is modest in size, and the rising action has several mini climaxes. These are incidents that build upon each other, instead of just one smooth rise to the top. The falling action is shorter than the rising action, and the denouement doesn’t carry on. 

It’s infuriating, sometimes, to be pulled back into structure. But don’t be fooled; it’s a good way to improve your writing. 

Happy editing

Author Blog Spotlight – Neil Gaiman

Image

Humans like lists. They help us organize the chaotic world around us. In my mind I have a list, a hierarchy, of writers, and it goes like this:

Would-Be Writers

I’ve been this, and I think most kids would qualify. The would-be writer loves books and stories, and aspires to write, but loses interest in their own story after a few pages and either moves on to something else, or stops writing and never goes back to the story they started. This is me aged 5 to age 18. I have crayon-written stories about a wild goose that had laser eyes written on the back of an envelope to prove it. 

Hobbyist Writers

This creature writes flash fiction, short stories, and even full manuscripts in their spare time. However, they never edit these works, and promptly shut them away in a desk and they are never given a second thought. They write for the fun of it, the same way a person goes swimming without ever dreaming of being the next Michael Phelps. 

Aspiring Authors, A.K.A Literary Losers

The category I put myself in. Writers who write flash fictions, short stories, novels, and everything in between, who also take time to edit their works and want to publish them. However, this category of writer has not yet had any such luck, beyond perhaps a solitary short story in a magazine or a poem in a news paper. 

Authors

These are the writers who have ‘made it’. They’ve published a book, weather it’s a novel or a collection of short stories. If not a book, they’ve published many short stories and poems to magazines and such. 

Great Authors, or Literary Greats

Authors like Stephen King, J.K Rowling, Jen Lancaster and Terry Pratchett. These authors are enormously successful and talented. 

Storytellers

This, in my mind, is the highest level of writing. It is different from ‘Literary Greats’ because this writer does not stick to one genre or age group. Their talent transcends all niches and pigeon holes. They tell stories about many things, to anyone, young and old or male or female or anything else between. They are the bards that wandered through 16th century Europe. They are the wise ones sitting on a rock under a tree, sought out by young and old. They painted the caves of old and made us believe in dragons. 

Neil Gaiman is a Storyteller if there ever was one. His works span everything, from a panda-centric picture book, to a non-fiction Douglas Adams companion, to the Nebula Award winning American Gods. All of his works deliver, and so does his blog. 

It’s a look into the mind, and life, of a literary genius. If that weren’t incentive enough, here’s the breakdown:

For the Writer – A look into what it’s like to a a famous author, and a chance to see how he’s inspired to write

For the Fan – Message boards, lists of upcoming appearances, and the updates on his work

Layout – Clean and stylish

Updated – Sporadically, but what do you expect from someone who’s so busy? 

 

And for a man as busy as Neil, this blog is utterly fantastic. There’s a reason many great authors don’t have blogs, and I’ll never stop appreciating the fact that he takes time out of his busy day to keep one up. Check it out, and you won’t be disappointed:

http://www.neilgaiman.com

Relating to Race, an Angry Post

Image

I love Neil Gaiman before I even knew who he was. I spent hours reading and rereading Coraline when I was 11 years old. Because I was 11, I didn’t give a crap who the author was and I’ve only recently realized he’s had his hands in so many works I loved as a child. Todays post was supposed to be an author blog spotlight post about his blog, and it isn’t. Yes, something has pissed me off enough to push that back another day. This post is going to be a little angry. If you have G rated eyes and would not like to read any swear words, please stop reading now and enjoy shaking your head at all these foul mouthed youths today. 

I was browsing through twitter, and came across a tweet* stating that the reason there are not more minority main characters in books is that they are hard for white people to relate to. 

Hard to relate to. 

Let’s illuminate this, shall we? Yes, there are other cultures out there, and they are VERY different. As a person who has been to many other countries where the main population is not white, I can personally attest to the fact that people who do not look like me may not have the same motivations and fears in life because of being part of a culture that is not my own. Yet….hard to relate to, and therefore cautioned against?

MOTHER FUCKER.

Here’s the thing.

SOME OF THE BEST BOOKS EVER WRITTEN WERE FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF MOTHER FUCKING ANIMALS. We write books where the main character is a goddamned elf from a different fucking dimension. We create entire different fucking universes and stupid ignorant mother fuckers can relate to that just fucking fine. The main character is a talking dog from planet Blargnat? Cool! The main character is Latino? Whoa, wait a minute there, that’s a little too crazy now. Are you fucking kidding me?! 

Seriously. This is not cool on so many fucking levels and no one seems to give a crap. Well, here I am, giving a crap. Want to join me? I’ll make us some capes and vigilante masks, and we will fly around calling bullshit on people who say that a minority main character shouldn’t be used because they’re too hard to relate to. 

My heart goes out to every POC who has tried to represent their own race and has been discouraged by others for doing so. I’ll never know that sort of frustration and sorrow, but I know it’s got to suck. 

Of course, for those of us in the majority, this brings to mind a serious consideration. If you are a person writing about a minority* race or culture that you’re not a part of yourself, do your research. Also, understand that while it may be very easy for you to write about a 3rd generation Chinese man, writing about a Chinese man living in China is a completely different ball game, and unless you yourself have lived in China for many years, I’d advise against it. It will not come off as authentic, and inaccuracies in your writing (there will no doubt be many) will not sit well with people who have actually lived in China. And please, for the love of Stephen Hawking, if a person from the race your are writing about points out something in your writing that is untrue, exaggerated, stereotypical, or written in a way that seems off to them, LISTEN. 

This has been your angry post for the month of May. Neil Gaiman tomorrow. I pinkie promise. 

*This tweeter shall not be named, because to be honest I can’t find that tweet again and I think it may have been taken down

Warm Fuzzies

Image

Todays post is short, and sweet, like the rejection that inspired it.

No one likes being rejected. It sucked at prom, and it sucks even more when querying a manuscript. However, sometimes you get a rejection that actually puts a smile on your face, like the one I got today:

Dear Samantha,
Thanks for being in touch. I’m afraid that I am overfull with client work at the moment and can’t commit to more. This sounds very interesting though—good luck with it!
Best wishes,
Name of Awesome Literary Agent

Actually taking the time to write the authors name, and a little note of encouragement can make a huge difference to a writer. That’s all it takes to put a smile on my face. In a world of form rejections, personal ones like this will always be a little ray of sunshine for me.

Ok, enough with the sappy stuff. Stay tuned for tomorrow’s author blog spotlight featuring the fantastic Neil Gaiman!

Read What You Write

Image

I have one hundred and twenty seven books on my Kindle. Twenty-nine of those are children’s books, specifically MG (that’s lit speak for Middle Grade, where the target audience is 10-14). I read them or reread them no matter where I am. Now, as a twenty-two year old woman, there are a lot of people who would tell me I’m immature for reading Into the Land of Unicorns with my glass of wine at the end of the day, but those people can suck eggs*. You can’t be a good writer without reading copious amounts of books, and you can’t bee a good MG, YA, Horror, SciFi, etc., writer without reading books in the genre you write in.

Not only is it one of the most enjoyable ways to improve your writing, it’s also critical to know what’s on the market these days. It can save you the heartache of literary agents telling you that your ‘cutting edge’ scifi idea has actually been done to death. It can also help you to write appropriately for a specific age group. Can you remember how old you were when you started seeing words like ‘incredulously’ and ‘sultry’ and ‘horrific’ and in what context they were in? Dude, I can barely remember what I had for breakfast this morning**. Reading books targeted at a younger audience helps you get a feel for how to write, and also how much narration you need; remember that kids have shorter attention spans.

But now we’ve come to a problem that has very little to do with the literary industry. It’s a social problem. There’s a taboo against reading certain books if you are a certain sort of person. There are men who want to write about impassioned love affairs and daring trysts, but wouldn’t be caught dead reading a romance novel. I get weird looks when I read a children’s book on the train. Many women feel like scifi is for men***, or at least the writing of it is. All of this is complete and utter bullshit, of course, but the breaking of taboos is easier said than done. No matter how much you disagree with the rules of society, the repercussions of breaking said rules can still sting. One of the best ways to shut up the naysayers is to be honest. Tell them that you’re reading a chapter book because you want to write one. Or, tell them the truth: that i’s none of their business what you read. That a man can love a romance novel, a woman can love scifi, and that an adult can love a children’s book. Should the situation be appropriate, you can also consider flipping them off. If you’re still shy, I’d invest in a Nook or Kindle. The cover of your book won’t be visible to anyone, and if a person asks what you’re reading, you can always lie.

All of this boils down to a simple point: You need to read what you write, so find a way to do it. I’m about to continue rereading Into the Land of Unicorns (by Bruce Coville. Read it.) which pairs very nicely with Merlot.

*Preferably rotten eggs

**I can, however, remember the first time I read the word Licentious, and will forever associate horny men with lice

***Mary Shelly, who wrote Frankenstein’s Monster and is widely credited as the inventor of the genre, would disagree

Where a Good Story Comes From

Image

I will admit to having committed a literary sin. I will make every attempt to write well, in hopes that I can atone for it, and I swear, I had a good reason.

I’ve read the Twilight Series.

Wait! Before you throw that rotten tomato, you should know that I read them because my much younger sister expressed an interest in reading them. Knowing that they dealt with the topic of sex at times, my mother asked me to read them and determine if they were suitable for my thirteen year old sis. Needless to say, I was appalled and had a very long conversation with my sister about what is romance and what is controlling behavior.

The point of this is that I have read the Twilight Series, and I made it all the way through solely because I had to. This is a series that deals with love, death, vampires, werewolves, and fantastic battles. I was bored to tears. I found the characters listless, irritating and the overall style of writing to be rather bland and repetitive.

Now take any of Jen Lancaster’s memoirs. Sometimes this woman write a story about going to a grocery store, and I’m trying very hard not to laugh out loud in public. She writes about the banalities of her life in a way that makes them interesting, and writes about big events in a way that conveys mountains of emotion, paired with the grit of reality.

So here it is: A talented writer can make anything enjoyable to read. 

I think that far too many fledgling writers* are caught up with trying to make their stories newer and more exciting. Lets add dragons! Let’s add a love octagon! Let’s add a million mental disorders!** thinking that if they don’t, their writing will be crap. This couldn’t be further from the case. A good story is interesting, sure, but the writing is what makes it that way. Remember the acronym, K.I.S.S*** when it comes to fleshing out your story. Don’t worry if your story is too boring, and don’t try to spice it up if it means doing so just to make it more commercially exciting. Good writing comes from a good writer, and good writers come from a lot of practice.

* The PC term for literary losers

** Mental illness represented in a character who has a purpose in the plot other than being the ‘psycho’? Great! Mental illness as a plot device or shortcut to villainy? Boo.

*** Keep It Simple, Stupid

 

Writer’s Forum Contest Results! (April)

Image

Aaaand the results are in! The winner is………

Not me. But I’m totally cool with that! I DID get some awesome feedback on my writing, which was the main reason I entered the contest anyhow. Here’s a copy of feedback, from Lorraine Mace:

Presentation: Manuscript layout needs some attention. You might find this post useful: http://suemoorcroft.wordpress.com/manuscript-presentation/ and also this one: http://thewritersabcchecklist.blogspot.com/2011/01/punctuating-dialogue.html for dialogue punctuation. Typo: is/his, Aaron/Arron

Title: Apt for the story, but not intriguing.

Opening: This introduces the main character and contains a strong hook to grab the reader’s attention, giving us a reason to read on.

Dialogue: Minimal

Characterisation: I felt as if I knew Aaron’s insecurities and fantasies, but ultimately, I wasn’t convinced by his actions.

Overall: We are in Aaron’s head throughout the story, so the switch at the end takes us out of his point of view and reminds us that an author is pulling the strings. Also, I’m not sure you have decided what the theme of your story is meant to be. What do you want readers to take from it? How do you want them to feel when they reach the end? You clearly have talent and I hope to see more of your work, but this story feels as if you haven’t thought it through with regards to plot, theme and outcome.

One to learn from – use this experience to help with your next story

 

Not exactly a glowing review, and that’s the whole point. I’m overjoyed to have a professional opinion! Especially when it comes to the layout, since that tends to get muddled when I transfer the file over from mac pages to microsoft word. I can also agree on the constructive criticism given about the theme and plot; short stories have always been more like vignettes in my mind. Brief glimpses of a particular time and mood. With the next short story I enter into this contest, I’m going to give it some serious stand alone structure that will put the framework of the Sears Tower* to shame.

I highly recommend entering this contest if you want good feedback on your writing style. You can find the link to this contest by clicking the Writer’s Forum logo at the top of this post.

Now, if y’all will excuse me, I’ve got a short story to perfect.